Best Peec AI alternatives in 2026

Peec.ai is a well-regarded AI visibility tracker. It refreshes daily on all paid tiers, offers an MCP server and a Customer API, and has a broad partner ecosystem. It also starts from a three-platform base plan, and extra platforms are paid add-ons billed one by one. If that model does not suit you, or you need different coverage, this guide lists seven alternatives.

Each entry covers what the tool is, who it fits and which engines it tracks. The facts come from our own compare pages, checked against each vendor's public pages. Vendors change their products, so confirm details before you buy.

Why people look for Peec AI alternatives

• Platform add-ons. The base plan covers three platforms. More are billed per platform, and that includes Claude. Teams that want every engine end up with an itemized bill.
• Regional scope. Country and language scoping is one to three, depending on tier.
• Different scope. Some teams want content or SEO tools around the tracking. Others want a simpler tool.

Peec has real strengths. If you want unlimited seats for a large team or agency, a broad MCP and partner ecosystem, and a funded vendor with a long reference list, and you are fine adding platforms individually, it is a sound choice.

1. Pineprompt

Pineprompt is a self-serve AI visibility tracker. All eight engines are included on every plan, Claude and Grok among them, with no add-ons. Every prompt runs daily. Each answer is scored on five signals, competitor discovery is included, and the refresh rate, sources and limits are published.

The MCP server is on every plan. The REST API and Looker Studio connector are on the Professional and Business plans. Country and language are set per monitor. Plans allow 50 to 350 tracked prompts.

Fits: teams that want the full picture from day one and a predictable bill, and that want data in their own tools.

Limits: it is monitoring only, with no site audits or content tools, and no free trial. See the Pineprompt vs Peec.ai comparison and the pricing page.

2. Otterly.ai

Otterly names six platforms. Gemini and Google AI Mode are paid add-ons, and Claude and Grok are not tracked. Prompts refresh daily, citations weekly, and there is no public API. It has a native one-click Looker Studio connector, broad geographic coverage and a lighter entry tier.

Fits: teams testing a category on a smaller commitment who do not need Claude or Grok.

Engines: six named. See Pineprompt vs Otterly.ai.

3. AthenaHQ

AthenaHQ tracks eight platforms on its Self-Serve plan, with more on request. Usage is metered in credits, where one credit is one response. The API, daily refresh and multi-region tracking are Enterprise features. Native connectors cover GA4, Search Console, Shopify, Webflow and Framer, and it adds an agentic copilot and a citation-probability model.

Fits: teams that want ready-made connectors and accept credit-metered usage.

Engines: eight. See Pineprompt vs AthenaHQ.

4. Promptwatch

Promptwatch bundles tracking with crawler logs, visitor analytics and an article generator. It lists nine platforms, including DeepSeek, and offers an API, MCP server and Looker Studio. Its methodology is not published.

Fits: teams that want one subscription for tracking, AI crawler activity, AI-referred visitors and content.

Engines: nine. See Pineprompt vs Promptwatch.

5. Profound

Profound is an enterprise agent suite sold through a demo and a sales process. It lists nine or more platforms on Enterprise, with narrower entry tiers, and offers an API, SDKs and MCP at the sales-led level. It also offers panel-sourced Prompt Volumes data, which refreshes weekly, and covers Meta AI and DeepSeek at the top tier.

Fits: enterprise teams buying an agent platform.

Engines: nine or more on Enterprise. See Pineprompt vs Profound.

6. Scrunch

Scrunch pairs monitoring with site audits, page optimizations, AI agent traffic analysis and agent-optimized pages (AXP). Core lists four engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot) and 125 prompts, with a 7-day free trial. Claude, Gemini, Grok and AI Mode are listed on the custom-priced Enterprise plan.

Fits: teams that want to fix visibility gaps in the same product.

Engines: four on Core, more on Enterprise. See Pineprompt vs Scrunch.

7. SE Visible

SE Visible is SE Ranking's AI visibility tracker. It lists ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode and AI Overviews, with Claude marked as coming soon, and Grok and Copilot are not listed. Plans cover 200, 450 or 1,000 prompts, with unlimited users and a 10-day free trial. It has an API covering projects, prompts, mentions and sentiment; MCP and Looker Studio are not listed.

Fits: teams that want a free trial, unlimited users and a higher prompt count, and do not need Claude yet.

Engines: five. See Pineprompt vs SE Visible.

Other tools worth a look

• Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit sits inside Semrush. Its docs name Google AI Mode and ChatGPT and do not list every engine. It tracks 25 prompts in the toolkit, runs daily and includes an AI Search Site Audit. (comparison)
• Goodie is a full-stack platform with optimization actions and a content studio. Core lists five models and Pro lists eight, with a 7-day free trial on Core. (comparison)
• Rankscale is credit-based and lists 17+ engines on every plan, with page audits. (comparison)
• Writesonic GEO pairs tracking with content tools and AI agents. Starter, Basic and Growth list three platforms, and Enterprise lists ten. (comparison)
• Evertune targets mid-market and enterprise teams, with 11 models on Pro and each prompt sampled 100 times. (comparison)
• Ahrefs Brand Radar sits inside Ahrefs and lists seven AI surfaces without Claude. (comparison)

A quick comparison of coverage

Engine coverage is the clearest difference between these tools, so here it is in one place, as listed on each vendor's public pages:

• Pineprompt: eight, on every plan.
• Peec.ai: three on the base plan, more as paid add-ons.
• Otterly.ai: six named, with Gemini and Google AI Mode as add-ons.
• AthenaHQ: eight on Self-Serve.
• Promptwatch: nine.
• Profound: nine or more on Enterprise, narrower below.
• Scrunch: four on Core.
• SE Visible: five.

A longer list is not automatically better. What matters is whether the engines your buyers use are covered on the plan you can afford, and whether the refresh rate is fast enough to catch changes.

How to choose

Begin with engines. Write down the assistants your buyers use, then check which are included on the plan you would actually buy, and which are add-ons. Compare the total, not the entry price.

Next, decide between a tracker and a suite. A focused tracker is easier to adopt. A suite such as Scrunch, Promptwatch or Semrush makes sense if you will use the audits and content features.

Then look at seats and reporting. Agencies may value unlimited seats and partner integrations, which is where Peec is strong. Teams reporting into Looker Studio or their own warehouse should confirm which plan includes the API and connectors.

Where Pineprompt fits

Pineprompt suits teams that want every engine on day one, daily runs and no itemized platform bill. It is not the right fit if you want a free trial, content tools or unlimited seats. Compare plans on the pricing page.